Nitzavim

 

Not with you alone do I make this covenant and this oath.  But with those who are standing here with us today before God, our God and with those who are not here with us today…

29:13 - 14

 

 

The reading of this chapter suggests that only a complete suspension of all the laws of nature could sever the bond that exists between Israel and its God…Also, if we cannot contravene the laws of the Torah physically, what about the concept of free will upon which the entire system of reward and punishment is built?...We musts subscribe to the notion that the eternal existence of the Jewish people as well as their special status…is not tied to the observance or non observance of the covenant, but rather that it is anchored in the very nature of this people, which will not change even when defying the covenant…the so called voluntary acceptance was induced by the realization that if God were to forsake them, their very existence would come to an end, as had been demonstrated by their experience with Haman.

Akedat Yitzchak (15th Century)

 

Even as no limit has been placed upon the number of persons included in the covenantal oath, so too, no limit has been set to its validity.  The covenant embraces all persons that are counted among the nation of Israel, for all time to come.  Thus the text unequivocally refutes the notion that the commitment to the Law is only temporary, or that anyone is ever free to withdraw from this commitment…

Samson Raphael Hirsch (19th Century)

 

Moses is implying here that when the choice is made, one is to make sure that it is not for oneself alone, but for one’s children as well.  It is as if Moses were saying:  Make sure that the way of the Torah you are accepting is not a way which creates a gap between the generations.  A culture and a way of life cannot be tested in one generation.  It stands the test only if it is perpetuated and proves viable for “you and your children.”…It is through the fulfillment of commandments that families comes together to sit around the same table and share ideas and ideals.

Pinchas Peli (20th Century)

 

The question that one may ask is to what extent man is free to choose, as part of natural reality, in which one thing by necessity follows from another…the naïve ones among us, t hat claim that man’s free will is one of the basic principles of religious faith, make a grave error…There are those who claim, for alleged reasons of faith, that we must deduce from the Torah that man has free choice:  “I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse:  therefore choose life.”  But one should not that the Torah demands of man to choose the good and to choose life, but does not promise that he has the power to choose…It does not state that man is capable of doing so, but that he is commanded to attempt to choose the good and not the bad, the blessing and not the curse, life and not death.

Yeshayau Leibowitz (20th Century)